The Technology Elite of Latin America
Part 4: Psychographic Characteristics
In Part 3, we saw how household wealth is related to technological affluence . But we saw that household wealth is a necessary, but not sufficient, condition for technological richness. On one hand, if one has few financial resources, then one is limited in the number of technological assets that one can acquire. On the other hand, just because one is wealthy does not mean that one has to expend those financial resources on acquiring technologies for the household. The decision to acquire technology becomes a matter of values, attitudes and lifestyles. For $3,000, one person may decide to purchase an advanced personal computer while another person would rather have a diamond ring.
Guatemala City, Guatemala
(photo credit: Nitzia Thomas)
In the Los Medios y Mercados de Latinoamérica 1998 study, there is a battery of attitudinal questions. In a previous note, we had created a set of five mutually exclusive and exhaustive groups of people on the basis of their answers to this battery. Here is the distribution of these segments within the persons whose households are characterized as being the technology elite, compared with that in the total survey population. The index is simply the ratio of the two percentages in that segments. According to this table, the technology elite is loaded with 'Global Professionals', to no one's surprise.
Segment |
% of Technology Elite |
% of Total Persons 12-64 |
Index |
Global Professionals | 37% | 21% | 177 |
Image Seekers | 23% | 22% | 103 |
Curious Cosmopolitans | 19% | 19% | 97 |
Concerned Traditionalists | 15% | 21% | 73 |
Comfortable Conservatives | 7% | 17% | 39 |
(source: Los Medios y Mercados de Latinoamérica 1998)
In the following table, we show the answers to a select set of statements given by the technology elite compared to the total survey population. The index is calculated as the ratio of the two percentages. If they have the same percentages, the index is 100. Indices that are much bigger or smaller than 100 represent strong divergence.
Statement |
% Agree Mostly by Technology Elite | % Agree Mostly by Total Persons 12-64 |
Index |
I try to keep abreast of changes in styles and fashion | 29% | 24% | 123 |
I have a lot of interests and hobbies | 33% | 28% | 119 |
I like to learn about other cultures | 61% | 54% | 113 |
I would pay extra for a quality brand name product | 47% | 42% | 113 |
I like visiting new and strange places | 41% | 46% | 111 |
I am interested in the events that take place in other countries | 36% | 34% | 105 |
I like to meet a lot of new people | 53% | 52% | 103 |
I will try something just because it is new | 20% | 20% | 99 |
I am worried that I (or family member) will lose job or not find one | 73% | 75% | 97 |
In my spare time, I would rather watch TV or read than go out with friends | 35% | 38% | 92 |
I am very concerned that pollution affects people's health | 68% | 71% | 92 |
I prefer to buy things that my friends would approve of | 13% | 15% | 91 |
I have anxieties about how much things cost | 62% | 69% | 90 |
People should respect traditional values more | 58% | 66% | 88 |
American products are better | 18% | 20% | 88 |
I tend to be the first among my friends to try new things | 19% | 21% | 87 |
I prefer to buy products manufactured in my own country | 40% | 50% | 81 |
I have little desire to travel and see the world | 18% | 24% | 77 |
I feel my life is dominated by events that are out of my control | 10% | 14% | 70 |
I am not up to date with today's modern technology | 20% | 29% | 69 |
(source: Los Medios y Mercados de Latinoamérica 1998)
Whenever we have a long list of variables that seems to be correlated with an outcome, we have to face the possibility that these variables may be correlated with each other and therefore some of them may be redundant. As it were, we would like to get to the essence of the matter. Or, using Occam's Razor, we want the simplest correct explanation.
We applied a formal statistical procedure here. The problem is set up a logistic regression, with the outcome variable being membership in the technology elite (yes/no) and the predictor variables being the annual household income and all the attitudinal variables. Only those variables which are statistically meaningful (specifically, they have a less than 5% chance of occurring by chance alone) are retained in the final model. Here is the summary of the model, which incorporates these predictor variables:
Annual household income is by far the most significant predictor
"I try to keep abreast of changes in styles and fashion" is the second most significant predictor, being related in a positive sense
"I have little desire to travel and see the world" is the third most significant predictor, being related in a negative sense
"I am not up to date with today's modern technology" is the fourth most significant predictor, being related in a negative sense. We note that the second, third and fourth predictors have about the same significance levels
"I feel my life is dominated by events that are out of my control" is the fifth most significant predictor, being related in a negative sense
"I prefer to buy things that my friends would approve of" is the sixth most significant predictor, being related in a positive sense.
"I am very concerned that pollution affects people's health" is the seventh most significant predictor, related in a negative sense.
"I would pay extra for a quality brand name product" is the eight most significant predictor, related in a positive sense.
"I have anxieties about how much things cost" is the ninth most significant predictor, related in a negative sense.
"I have a lot of interests and hobbies" is the tenth most significant predictor, related in a positive sense. We note that the fifth through tenth variables are significant about the same levels and may be otherwise dropped if we had chosen a more stringent significance level.
The picture that emerges is a person who is affluent, technologically sophisticated, fashion conscious, curious about the world and anxiety-free about their economic livelihood.
OTHER DISCUSSIONS ABOUT THE TECHNOLOGY ELITE OF LATIN AMERICA
(posted by Roland Soong on 1/14/00)
(Return to Zona Latina's Home Page)